Re: [ietf-dkim] Status and direction

> Therefore, the first thing we have to do, right now, is take care of the
> errata, with clarification, but not change, on the i= issue.
Dave's draft clarifies the meaning and use of i=.  It's time for a last
call on it.

R's,
John

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html