At 16:38 18-02-2009, John Levine wrote:
I've been collecting the DKIM signatures on my incoming mail, and
I'm surprised how few of them have i= at all. Ignoring my own
As I mentioned previously, there are some DKIM signers using
i=. Usually, it is when the domain part of the address is a subdomain.
By far the largest stream of DKIM signed mail is from gmail which
doesn't use i=.
There is a problem with their interpretation of a DKIM signed mail
when the i= is set.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html