ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type

2009-06-02 13:20:59

On Jun 2, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
Eliot Lear wrote:
  ... you do not see a benefit in stating the algorithm in the key  
record when it has already been stated in the header, that perhaps  
there is some nebulous potential downgrade attack.  Is that right?

Yes.

And it's not "the" algorithm in the DNS record; it's a list of  
possible algorithms.  The list does not help the receiver know which  
algorithm is used for a particular message.

The list allows a recipient, during transitions to new algorithms, to  
recognize whether it might be used by the domain, even when a receiver  
has not yet implemented the algorithm.  This feature should limit the  
range of exploits that might otherwise prove successful during a  
transition in algorithms that may take long periods before full  
adoption.

-Doug

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html