ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support

2009-06-02 15:04:33
from [Murray S. Kucherawy] [Permanent Link] 
Quoth Jon Callas:

I don't think it's worth expending breath on removing SHA1. [...]


+1

-MSK

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- k: Key type, Douglas Otis
Next by Date:  Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- x=, John R. Levine
Previous by Thread:  Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis - whether to drop -- SHA1 support, Suresh Ramasubramanian
Next by Thread:  [ietf-dkim] Fwd: Last Call: draft-ietf-opsawg-operations-and-management (Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management of New Protocols and Protocol Extensions) to BCP, Barry Leiba
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]