Jim Fenton wrote:
Finally, will you be taking this proposed text to the ADs who had
concerns to determine whether this addresses their concerns? I'm
wondering whether they expected a change to be made, since none of them
raised a DISCUSS on this issue (Cullen abstained).
I am planning to ask Cullen if he finds the new text clearer than
the old one...
Best regards,
Pasi
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html