On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 9:07 PM, <Bill(_dot_)Oxley(_at_)cox(_dot_)com> wrote:
+1
+1
<t>For signers and verifiers that have been using the i= tag as the
primary value that is delivered to the assessor, a software change to
using the d= tag is intended.
</t>
s/intended/required/ possibly?
Otherwise I'm good with this change.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html