I would ask them "Are you aware that this record contains tag keys and
values that are not part of DKIM?"
If they say yes and can tell me what they're doing, I'd gladly publish
the record.
If they say no, I'd have a chance to educate them and we'd go through
the record point by point.
Tony Hansen
Steve Atkins wrote:
Chatting with people offlist the issue of whether there is such a
thing as a good or bad DKIM record came up.
I'm trying to get a feel for peoples views on that so, to give a
concrete example, if your postmaster came to you with this DKIM record
they wanted you to publish in DNS, would you publish it as-is? If not,
why not?
september2006._domainkey.example.com 300 IN TXT "version=DKIM1; a=rsa-
sha1; c=simple/simple; hash=sha1; t=testing; p=MIGfMA0G<more base64
gunk>;"
Cheers,
Steve
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html