Re: [ietf-dkim] Broken signature analysis

> > > Doesn't that conflict with the practice of removing A-Rs?
> > You only need to remove A-Rs that claim to be from you.
> That's a claim worth challenging.
Well, that's what section 5 of RFC 5451 says.  If you think it's
wrong, why didn't you say so back when there was time to change it?

R's,
John
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html