On 3/11/2010 9:28 AM, Ellen Siegel wrote:
I agree with Dave that that the existing document is already pretty
clear on this positioning, but I can live with this addition.
I don't see any harm in the addition.
I also don't see any benefit.
For a change like this to be the total result of a Discuss -- other than the
delay and extra email traffic -- should bother folks.
But this won't be the first unnecessary change to an RFC that was made to keep
an AD happy rather than to improve the document. So I can live with it.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html