On Thursday, July 22, 2010, Barry Leiba
<barryleiba(_dot_)mailing(_dot_)lists(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
[...]
There are three applicable responses:
[...]
Held for document update: The item is correct, but it is not
immediately critical, and may be incorporated in the next revision of
the document.
Barry, I don't think your description is quite correct. "Held for
update" is also used for something which is too big or too
controversial for "verified". It doesn't have to be correct. But of
course it is not obviously incorrect either.
Alexey
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html