On 7/29/10 1:21 PM, Charles Lindsey wrote:
Various suggestions to mitigate this problem have been mooted, but none
of them works perfectly, mainly because they rely on certain behaviours by
discardable.example, MLM.example and discardable.example, all of whom need
to persuaded to observe whatever "Best Practice" is being proposed.
Charles,
The TPA-Label approach does _not_ depend upon changes made by the
mailing-list! The TPA-Label limits change to code already handling ADSP
records, and of course to domains making ADSP assertions. There is only
a small number of domains making actionable ADSP assertions. The
TPA-Label would allow Author Domains a means to assert explicit
exceptions when processing their restrictive ADSP assertions. Rather
than thousands of mailing lists, and MUA clients requiring change, only
recipients would be advised to sort these messages into separate
folders, which most already do anyway.
-Doug
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html