--On 29 July 2010 20:53:40 +0200 "J.D. Falk"
<jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org> wrote:
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:09 PM, Ian Eiloart wrote:
--On 26 July 2010 18:24:34 +0200 "J.D. Falk"
<jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org> wrote:
I think it's because, when you implement most protocols, if your end is
broken then you can't even talk to the other end. With ADSP, if your
end is broken then you can still talk SMTP and even sign with DKIM, but
the other end may silently discard your message. There's no feedback.
About 90% of the email sent to my personal email address ends up in a
Gmail junk mail folder, that I never check. There's no feedback there,
either.
As far as SMTP is concerned, that mail was successfully delivered.
huh? The complaint is that the message is silently discarded somewhere
downstream, and the sender gets no feedback. How can it matter what the
technical means of achieving this are?
--
Ian Eiloart
IT Services, University of Sussex
01273-873148 x3148
For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html