John Levine has reiterated and reminded "there's no such thing as a
"3rd party signing policy" in DKIM or ADSP, hence we should talk about it.
I don't wish to have trouble here.
I was planning of writing a I-D ADSP extension to add a new tag that
will propose a lite weight third party signer allow list. Doug Otis
has alway written a TPA (Third Party Authorization) extension for ADSP.
Question:
Is there a IETF RFC conflict with the functional specification of ADSP
designed to exclude third party signing consideration with ADSP
extensions that attempts to add third party signing practices?
Thanks
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html