Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
I've posted a new issue of the DKIM implementation report. The most
interesting changes are the inclusion of a day of sample data from AOL and a
revision of the data summary reported by the OpenDKIM stats project using the
updated schema, which allows a few interesting new observations.
Thanks for the report.
I believe the most outstanding data point here is the extremely high
original signing of mail. AOL's 1.2 out of 1.4 billion or 86%
signatures were 1st party and your own statistics showed 73% were 1st
party.
This validates what I have always been felt is the high promise for
DKIM exclusive (1st party or passive 3rd party) operations. Policy is
inevitable to facilitate policy (domain expectation) fault detection.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html