Re: [ietf-dkim] Full name problem

> Um, you must be new here.  We've argued about this ad nauseam
> over the years.
We have, but I think this is an unnecessarily brusque way to point that out.

In any case, let me cut this line of discussion off by saying that any
consideration of the "display name" portion of any address field is
out of scope.

Barry, as chair

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html