[ietf-dkim] issue: Section 2.3 Evaluation Layer introduction

Hector Santos wrote:
> Fundamentally, we tried to make DKIM-BASE independent of specific 
> implementation evaluation methods starting by pulling semantics 
> regarding policy.
>
> However, an evaluation layer for trust was reintroduced in section 2.3.
>
> 2.3.  Identity
>
>     A person, role, or organization.  In the context of DKIM, examples
>     include the author, the author's organization, an ISP along the
>     handling path, an independent trust assessment service, and a mailing
>     list operator.
Per Murray request to suggest changes for posted issues, in lieu of 
removing the trust assessment layer semantic, a more consistent text 
that helps promote implementation synergism for wider deployment 
scenarios might be:

   2.3.  Identity

   A person, role, or organization.  In the context of DKIM, examples
   include the author, the author's organization, an author
   authorized signer or independent trusted signer domain
   along the handling path.

If considered, that would be enough for me to give the RFC4871bis last 
call a "ready to go" endorsement

-- 
HLS


_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html