-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:ietf-dkim-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Alessandro
Vesely
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 12:03 PM
To: ietf-dkim(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] Output requirements
How about mentioning ignored signatures, e.g.,
The output MAY include further data, such as properties or result
meta-data of any signatures, including ignored ones, for use by
modules that consume those results at any stage of the verification
process.
(Just to make clear that all the "SHOULD ignore" are not conflicting
with this.)
Works for me.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html