FYI, in case anyone wants to comment.
-----Original Message-----
From: marf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:marf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, February 29, 2012 6:58 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: marf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [marf] Last Call: <draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-11.txt> (Extensions
to DKIM for Failure Reporting) to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the Messaging Abuse Reporting Format WG
(marf) to consider the following document:
- 'Extensions to DKIM for Failure Reporting'
<draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting-11.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-03-14. Exceptionally, comments
may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain
the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This memo presents extensions to the DomainKeys Identified Mail
(DKIM) specification to allow for detailed reporting of message
authentication failures in an on-demand fashion.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-marf-dkim-reporting/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
marf mailing list
marf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/marf
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html