On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 6:26 AM, Richard Dawe
<rich(_dot_)dawe(_at_)messagesystems(_dot_)com>wrote:
Do you think that DMARC provides a better way of testing your DKIM
signatures than DKIM's t=y? E.g.: "p=none" DMARC policy.
I don't understand what you're after here. How would a mail receiver apply
"p=none" as different from handling a bad signature? In both cases,
delivery is supposed to be unaffected.
-MSK
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html