ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (3758)

2013-10-20 14:58:09
On 10/20/2013 3:50 PM, Tony Hansen wrote:
Perhaps, if this document is ever cracked open again, it would be useful
to tag things better to make it painfully obvious what is being
discussed. For example,

     v= [Signature] Version (plain-text; REQUIRED) ...


Within the definition text, perhaps.

However we could develop a referential norm, independent of that, and 
then call for its use whenever docs are modified.  Something like the 
email header naming convention would make sense.

Hence:

   Signature.v =

   Key.h =

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html