If someone familiar with the dkim abnf could comment I'd be
happy to approve/reject this as appropriate.
S
On 26/09/16 20:15, RFC Errata System wrote:
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6376,
"DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures".
--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6376&eid=4810
--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Juan Altmayer Pizzorno <juan(_at_)sparkpost(_dot_)com>
Section: 3.5
Original Text
-------------
x-sig-q-tag-args = qp-hdr-value
Corrected Text
--------------
x-sig-q-tag-args = dkim-quoted-printable ; with ":" encoded
Notes
-----
sig-q-tag-methods are ":"-separated in sig-q-tag, so ":" shouldn't be
permitted
within x-sig-q-tag-args. Note that qp-hdr-value (which I believe was
originally
defined for sig-z-tag, which includes "|"-separated values) is defined as
qp-hdr-value = dkim-quoted-printable ; with "|" encoded
Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
--------------------------------------
RFC6376 (draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871bis-15)
--------------------------------------
Title : DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) Signatures
Publication Date : September 2011
Author(s) : D. Crocker, Ed., T. Hansen, Ed., M. Kucherawy, Ed.
Category : DRAFT STANDARD
Source : Domain Keys Identified Mail
Area : Security
Stream : IETF
Verifying Party : IESG
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html