On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 23:14:31 -0700, Jim Fenton wrote:
tag on the IIM-Sig header on this message for a sample). Should we have a
signature for the strict (non-canonicalized) form of the message as well, to
give that option to the recipient as well?
unfortunately, options are not free. they carry all sorts of system-level
costs
for adoption and use.
mostly, options should be provided because it is clear they do something
extremely important, rather than merely because they are nice.
--
Brandenburg InternetWorking
dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com
+1.408.246.8253