Re: [ietf-dkim] Purpose and sequence forDKIM specification and deploymen

> Perhaps divide and conquor is the best approach.  I'll volunteer to work 
> on the SSP group with others who think that's important.  One group can 
> work out what threats DKIM-base deals with and the others what the 
> addition of DKIM-SSP can deal with.  Then we can merge them.

I volunteer to work on DKIM-SSP also.  It is critically important if the 
prevention of unauthorized domain use in message headers is the issue.  I've 
posted up a couple of times already the specific problems SSP deals with. 
We could offer those as input into the threat analysis.

--
Arvel