Re: strings

> May I suggest yet another quality of strings -- namely, that
> * \r and \n have their C meanings in strings
> * and that the code fragment
>       "this string" "this string"
> be made equivalent to
>       "this stringthis string"
> In the most recent draft (03, due RSN) stringlists are comma-seperated, not
> LISP-style, so this is possible.
I thought we already agreed to this some time ago. In any case, I have no
problem with it.

                                Ned