On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 10:48:04AM -0700,
ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com quoted:
It may be OK to do that for spamtest, but I don't think its valid for
virustest. What we could do is:
spamtest value:
0 - unchecked
1 - definitely clear of spam
...
10 - definitely contains spam
virustest value:
0 - definitely clear of viruses
1 - possibly contains a virus/unchecked
2 - definitely contains a virus
That would eliminate NIL entirely.
I like it -- the current situation where NIL sorts at the end is very
awkward.
What do other people think?
Looks like a workable compromise that'll make the world a little safer.
Are we keeping the NIL suffix? Otherwise I'd ask to have a virustest
number reserved only for untested messages (not for a mix of untested
and unclear).
Keeping the suffix is fine with me.
Ned