> On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 09:21 -0700, Ned Freed wrote:
>>>if anyof (header :is "Cc" "", not exists "Cc")
>>
>>This is actually clearer to read IMO, and is probably how I would code it if
>>I ever wanted such a test.
Indeed. And so why don't we wrap up this too-long discussion this way?:
1. *Document* that string comparisons against headers MUST NOT match
absent headers.
2. *Document* that the preferred way to test for a header that is either
empty or absent is as Ned wrote above.
3. Move on.
+1.
Ned