[Top] [All Lists]

Re: comments on refuse

2005-08-15 02:34:27

Matthew Elvey wrote:

or if the sieve implementation
is behind any MTAs that don't synchronously pass-through messages.

A careful reading of the draft will show that such implementations cannot support the refuse extension.

Uh, no. This is not what the current text says and I don't think we should prohibit deployment of refuse for such configurations.

Please reread the draft and let me know if this is not clear. (Section 3, first paragraph)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>