Re: Default match types and for_every_part2006-07-11 15:49:58On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 12:21 +0100, Nigel Swinson wrote: I think it should be foreverypart, not for_every_part. We already have addheader, deleteheader, fileinto. We don't have add_header, delete_header, file_into. I think so, too. actually, I think I prefer "foreachpart", since "each" is more commonly used in iteration context in other programming languages. -- Kjetil T.
|
|