Alexey Melnikov wrote:
Ned Freed wrote:
In conclusion, Alexey has proposed new text in a separate messagage
which
I find completely acceptable. Please take a look at that and let's see
where we are.
Here is the proposal Ned was referring to:
And considering that the issue about Turing-completeness keep coming
back, I suggest one more additional change:
In Section 1, 2nd paragraph, replace last sentence:
OLD:
The base language is intentionally not Turing-complete: it provides
no way to
write a loop or a function and variables are not provided.
NEW:
The base language was not designed to be Turing-complete: it does not have
a loop command or function syntax.