Re: WGLC on draft-freed-sieve-notary-01.txt

> * Typo: Chapter 7, second capability name should be dsn-redirect. :)
Yep. Fixed.

> * Idea: Would it make sense to name these capabilities 'envelope-dsn'
> and 'redirect-dsn'? Because in a way they extend these existing
> capabilities, and also because in the future we could have names like
> 'envelope-auth' "align" with them.
I don't feel strongly about this either way, but I'm reluctant to change it
unless others agree that it is worth it. Comments?

                                Ned