No reason against it, just asking.
Should a redirect action use the original headers or the edited?
RFC 5293 section 7 second paragraph says it uses the modified header. The
example at the end of section 4 won't work if the original header is
used.
I'm assuming that reject and vacation use the original headers.
Reject generates a DSN or MDN; the first paragraph of section 7 clearly
states that the original header is used in such cases.
A lot of vacation implementations don't include the original message
in the response; in such cases the question is moot.
For those implementations that do include the original message, the same
paragraph also covers "similar disposition messages"; I'd say this sort of
vacation response falls into that category.
Ned
_______________________________________________
sieve mailing list
sieve(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve