In <408F67AE(_dot_)1060103(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> Matthew Elvey
<matthew(_at_)elvey(_dot_)com> writes:
[The SPF RFC] is quite plainly Standards Track, not an experimental
RFC hopeful.
I do not know all the details of the requirement difference between
experimental and standard track, but from the charter, it sounds like
these RFCs will all be experimental.
See:
In <938B9C24-858D-11D8-A7E0-000A95B3BA44(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> Andrew Newton
<andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us> writes:
Upon chartering of this working group, the IESG intends to
request that the IRTF Chair and the Chairs of the IRTF's
Anti-Spam Research Group seek publication of the listed input
documents as Experimental RFCs, so that they are available on
an archival basis. [...]
-wayne