On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 01:30, Peter Koch wrote:
Perhaps rather than just a single new record type, consider defining a
structure composed of new elements where each element is a record type.
1) An address type for CIDR notation for IPv4 and IPv6 addresses.
other than APL/RFC 3123?
Peter,
Thank you for the reference. This RFC would need to be elevated to
standards track and be one of the types supported. This would mean only
2 new record types need definition. An Inverse SRV record pointing to
3123 address records with a policy field and a protocol selector
function. With this, a PTR type using the same selector function as a
domain bridging mechanism. If this can happen, add in an SRV record
also using the selector function to reinforce this feature.
-Doug