Jim Fenton wrote:
It would be good to have common mechanisms for accessing this accreditation
data, so that the services can compete freely and recipients can easily use the
service that is best for them.
"Yes"
Does this make sense as a future work item for the (presumably rechartered)
MARID WG? Or does this sound like a separate WG? As mentioned above, MASS
will need the same thing.
"No, Yes" (please lets not do it here)
FWIW, a quick survey of the nascent accreditation/reputation service
market (bonded sender/senderbase, cloudmark rating, verisign's upcoming
accreditation list, numerous open community projects) reveals a strong
disposition of using DNSL-like protocols. Unfortunately, while the
query mechanism is standard, the query format and result are not
necessarily so.
-Rand