On Aug 19, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Andrew W. Donoho wrote:
For example, while Sender-ID is going out the door "first", it is to
be quickly followed by MPR (nee CSV-BATV?).
MPR is not a working group item.
Some of you may have noticed that this is a high-volume list. I was
asked by Wayne if it was ok to start discussing alternative drafts on
this list. My answer to him was: go ahead and submit them as
individuals but please hold off discussion until we have evaluated
Sender ID. I am not just asking this of Wayne but of all participants.
In the race for trying to solve the anti-phishing problem, Sender-ID
provides one extra step that will need to be buttressed by whatever
IETF MASS WG produces.
MASS is not yet a working group.
-andy