On Aug 19, 2004, at 11:31 AM, Dean Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
I suggest you look at RFC 2026, and tighten your terminology.
Is this a deliberate troll or are the insults merely gratuious?
You used the wrong terms, as I very politely explained. If you take
correction is insult, that's not my problem. However, it was not
gratuitous.
Is it possible that this back-and-forth volley can end without a
finding of fault on any party?
I'm sure there are valid points all the way around, but agreement to
disagree seems to be the only way forward.
-andy