On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 11:48, Rand Wacker wrote:
<snip/>
No. Both I and the people looking to implement these records feel quite
strongly that using the same record for both is very dangerous. In fact,
these largest sites are the ones who are *most* likely to have different
records (bit of a Catch 22 there).
Could you give an example? Or point to one is such an example exists?