RE: In favour of Sender ID (was: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courie

ietf-mxcomp

RE: In favour of Sender ID (was: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier.)

2004-08-30 15:16:27

Mark Lentczner wrote:

                         There is nothing heuristic in the PRA 
identity.  It follows directly from the RFC 2822 definition of the 
headers.


This statement makes me wonder how anyone could validly claim a
patent on an algorithm to find the PRA.

Daryl Odnert

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: In favour of Sender ID (was: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier.), Daryl Odnert <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Reputation services for SenderID, Douglas Otis
Next by Date:	Re: TECH-OMISSION: Legal liability for creating bounces fromforgedmessages, Mark Shewmaker
Previous by Thread:	Unencumbered Checking (was Re: DEPLOY: SPF/Sender ID support in Courier), Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.
Next by Thread:	RE: TECH-OMISSION: Security vulnerability - Malicious DSN attack s, Daryl Odnert
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]