ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DEPLOY: Rejection of Sender ID does not result in standardization of SPF Classic

2004-09-03 13:41:43

Rand Wacker <rand(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)com> writes:

Over the past two weeks I've seen two kinds of posts to this mailing list:

This message is itself out of order.  It's neither an indication that
you will or will not implement Sender-ID (and I believe Sendmail has
already made their position clear).

I see nothing procedurally wrong or confusing about someone saying "I
cannot implement Sender-ID" and including an aside that someone could
implement SPF as it was last proposed.  You are right that the aside has
no bearing on whether or not the chairs believe there is consensus, only
the statements about Sender-ID.

-- 
Daniel Quinlan
http://www.pathname.com/~quinlan/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>