ietf-mxcomp
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: consensus call on MUST/SHOULD language for TXT records

2004-09-04 18:39:50

Andrew Newton wrote:

On Sep 3, 2004, at 6:19 PM, Yakov Shafranovich wrote:

I am not sure how #1 differs from #2? Are you suggesting that if we adopt position #1, someone not having SPF RR records would be ignored?


My interpretation of the thread is "might be ignored".

-andy


Then I support #2 simply because I don't see how position #1 will be practical.

Yakov