On Tue, 2004-09-07 at 19:02, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
I have the feeling that people are going to write the first
form, so we might as well require implementations to support
it. As long as it's not ambiguous, lazy is okay.
OK, great. Yeah, we modified our Caller ID implementation to accept it
because webtv was doing it.
I'll just be glad to have it stated that we do have to read IPs written
that way.
Similarly "ipv4" and "ipv6" being synonyms for "ip4" and
"ip6", and "a:1.2.3.4" being interpreted as "ip4:1.2.3.4".
That seems to happen rather often.
Yeah, "liberal in what you accept" certainly doesn't do any harm,
there. :-)
-Max
--
Maxwell Kanat-Alexander
2nd Level Tech Support Engineer, USA
Kerio Technologies, Inc.