Re: A new SMTP "3821" [Re: FTC stuff...........]

On Nov 23, 2004, at 10:22 AM, Hector Santos wrote:

> What Alan is suggesting, for which I strongly agree, is that the focus 
> in
> solving the "problem" needs a revisiting of the SMTP model or more
> specifically, the functional specification.
That has been and still is the basis for all the disagreements in this 
area.
-andy

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature