But I thought that the question of CDR was to do with personal
privacy, not weither I was criminal or not!
I may not wish my mail, which could, be of a private nature to
me to be recoverable by any one but the recipient
i.e. an e-mail conversation with my doctor.
Mike.
----------
From: Adam Back
Sent: 15 October 1997 03:06
To: ietf-open-pgp(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: Schneier comment on CMR
(Quoted with permission from email).
Bruce Schneier <schneier(_at_)counterpane(_dot_)com>:
Corporate Data Recovery does not have to be resiliant to a hostile
user. If a criminal is stupid enough to use a system with corporate
data recovery to commit his crime, then he is stupid enough to do
half a dozen other things that will get him caught. If he is smart
enough to turn off a consentual data recovery feature, then he is
also smart enough to use a different encryption system if the data
recovery feature cannot be turned off.
Adam
--
Now officially an EAR violation...
Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U(_at_){$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`