you wrote:
It's not for surveillance. It's for recovering from disaster. I think it
would be a good thing to send a PGP message over an encrypted link (TLS or
other).
Jon
-----
Jon Callas jon(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com
Chief Scientist 555 Twin Dolphin Drive
Pretty Good Privacy, Inc. Suite 570
(415) 596-1960 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628 (RSA)
I have a question, exactly which clients of PGP requested GAK PGP? Air America?
Who is the driving force behind causing PGP to embrace GAK? CIA and NSA shell
companies with taxpayers money to spend to implement GAK, who know their
version would never sell, get you to do it for them?
CuriousMonger