CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments)

Ian Brown <I(_dot_)Brown(_at_)cs(_dot_)ucl(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> writes:
> "Additional request recipients" - as this is still such a controversial
> topic, I don't think it should be included in this first version of the
> standard.
Seconded.

Please let's concentrate on the core functionality without dragging in
controversial "message recovery" features.

> 6.2   - I know the inclusion of ROT-n started as a joke - but it's in
> there! Eeeek! 
I thought Jon was joking about these!  Remove at once please!

Adam