-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In <199803061654(_dot_)IAA23337(_at_)mail(_dot_)proper(_dot_)com>, on 03/06/98
at 08:49 AM, Paul Hoffman / IMC <phoffman(_at_)imc(_dot_)org> said:
If that is the case, S/MIME by default could emerge as the dominant
standard."
And, if that is not the case, OpenPGP has the chance to "win". However,
it will take more work than is being shown in this Working Group. It's
been three months since the DC IETF meeting, but we haven't seen a second
draft of the main spec or the first draft of the MIME integration spec.
From the discussion on this list, it looks like there are still thorny
issues left in the main draft. The only way to for OpenPGP to finish is
for it to keep going.
Well who is working on these drafts? where are they? And what needs to be
done to get them finished??
I started making phone calls yesterday trying to find out the status of
things but could not reach anyone. I have a lot of time and effort tied up
in this too see it get pissed away before the race even gets started.
- --
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii
Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0
Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice
PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail.
OS/2 PGP 2.6.3a at: http://users.invweb.net/~whgiii/esecure.html
- ---------------------------------------------------------------
Tag-O-Matic: Windows: an Unrecoverable Acquisition Error!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3a-sha1
Charset: cp850
Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000
iQCVAwUBNQAtcI9Co1n+aLhhAQFzLwP8CakQHdpeWtv+WBbh3JC707Bq5UKj6RYF
E3s2B8NXKr/B6D44LYfIGidTUdJHWMmYct5CehOSnHE8QZGDhvmFx0JzUKE0jZdb
GCKTsTJUA9m4qpt9WkJJZgj4jzXheDQjr0NNB/FN/uYr6biDiDykZufNg06KZDeM
EzLV7KQquxo=
=wELb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----