Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3

ietf-openpgp

Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3

1998-03-26 14:59:34

At 12:27 PM 3/26/98 -0800, Hal Finney wrote:

   [BTW, Jon, I notice that the wording in section 5.3 still uses the old
   term Conventional Encrypted Session Key in a few places.]
   
Thank you.

        Jon



-----
Jon Callas                                  jon(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com
CTO, Total Network Security                 4200 Bohannon Drive
Network Associates, Inc.                    Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 473-2860                              
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature Which is the preferred preference?, nospam-seesignature Obvious (?) question about interoperability, nospam-seesignature Why one pass sigs?, nospam-seesignature Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Jon Callas <= Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, nospam-seesignature

Previous by Date:	Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature
Next by Date:	Which is the preferred preference?, nospam-seesignature
Previous by Thread:	Why one pass sigs?, nospam-seesignature
Next by Thread:	Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]