Re: Twofish

uri <uri(_at_)watson(_dot_)ibm(_dot_)com> writes:

> I suggest *replacing* Blowfish with Twofish. If you trust one, why not
> the other?
I aggree, but we have to keep the algorithm id for Blowfish because
there are documents which are encoded with Blowfish.  However, we
should state that Blowfish is one of depreciated algorithms.


  Werner