Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers

ietf-openpgp

Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers

1999-04-12 16:09:00

Is Phil suggesting that we *NOT* use Twofish with packet 9, that we hold
off on large blocks until the new encrypted data packet gets defined?

        Jon



-----
Jon Callas                                  jon(_at_)pgp(_dot_)com
CTO, Total Network Security                 3965 Freedom Circle
Network Associates, Inc.                    Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 346-5860                              
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, hal Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, Jon Callas <= Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, uri Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, Werner Koch Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, Paul Koning Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, Adam Back Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, uri MDC symmetric sig type vs new bundled encrypt+MDC (Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers), Adam Back Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, Werner Koch Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion - Implementation?, Tom Zerucha Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion - Implementation?, uri Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion - Implementation?, Tom Zerucha

Previous by Date:	Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, hal
Next by Date:	Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, uri
Previous by Thread:	Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, hal
Next by Thread:	Re: Phil Zimmermann's suggestion for large ciphers, uri
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]