The new draft still does not have any details on notation data
naming, making these data essentially useless.
I propose to add the following text in the end of section 5.2.3.16
of the draft:
There are two name spaces for notation data names.
Notation data names in the IETF name space consist of an
arbitrary string of UTF-8 encoded characters, with the exception
that the character "@" ("at") MUST NOT occur in such a name.
Note: New notation data names in the IETF name space may be
registered by sending e-mail to
<new-pgp-notation-tag-reg(_at_)iana(_dot_)org>. The listing of current
values may be obtained by sending e-mail to
<pgp-notation-tags(_at_)iana(_dot_)org>.
Notation data names in the user name space consist of a tag,
followed by the "@" character, followed by a DNS domain name. The
tag may be an arbitrary string of UTF-8 encoded characters, with
the exception that the character "@" MUST NOT occur in such a
name. The use of a DNS domain name in notation data names MUST
have been agreed upon by the person or entity which controls said
DNS domain name.
Example: When The Hypothetical Example Corporation, which owns
the domain example.com, wishes to introduce sample notation data,
an appropriate notation data name could be "sample(_at_)example(_dot_)com".
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
(Maybe someone else has a better wording for the agreement clause
concerning DNS domain names.)
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/